Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	10.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141211
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '21 at 03:21
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8310 1,697 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 114 56% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 328 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 12.8 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 12 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,404 Write 33.2 Mixed 65.3 174% 834 MB/s	4K Read 236 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4.5 364% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 174 Write 162 Mixed 30 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 27 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 26.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 27.9 20% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 103%
pny USB 2.0 FD 16GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 005d, pny 16g Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 16 10% 16 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP497157-C01-ELDW Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 HP497157-C01-ELDW Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16