Gigabyte GA-H81N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81N  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '17 at 16:47
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 571
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 344.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 44.6
28% 37 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 36.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH128GCST 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTGAN102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 512
Write 399
Mixed 369
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 20.2
102% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 73.5
69% 110 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
442GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 155
Mixed 138
113% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81N Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback