Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 20:30
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 128
59% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 433
41% 341 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 83.8
74% 87.9 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 80
Splatting 72
70% 88.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 295 294 294 275 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 484
Write 309
Mixed 270
SusWrite 277
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 23.2
91% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 125
99% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
308GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 593 698 555 558 559 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 938
Write 594
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 587
176% 783 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 57.7
182% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 422
308% 402 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 148%
Great: 253%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
701GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 177
Write 143
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 0.7
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
188GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 100 99 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 65
SusWrite 98.5
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 84%
ST916082 1AS 160GB
91GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 25.3
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback