Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C09
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190904
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4920 384 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 98 2-Core 199 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 199 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 7C09) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 5.8 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH4 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 204 Write 142 Mixed 77.1 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2133 C15 1x4GB-$36 570 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	203x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	166x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	155x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $355

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16