HP 860-013a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 860-013a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 08:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 596
53% 451 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 144
Parallax 132
108% 136 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 333
Mixed 266
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 29.5
104% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 195
168% 249 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 94 91 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 139
Write 62.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 86.9
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-013a Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: HP 860-013a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $730
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback