Acer NG-VN7-791G-79QW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NG-VN7-791G-79QW  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer NG-VN7-791G-79QW
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 462
51% 400 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Acer(1025 091D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 17.4
16% 17.9 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 0.2
8% 11.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB
200GB free
Firmware: P191202a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 418 445 418 401 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 456
Mixed 407
SusWrite 421
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 40.3
144% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 229
175% 230 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 107%
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2AB990
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 85 77 56 51 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 75.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 64.5
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback