ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J4

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GE62 6QF
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J4 (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161003
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '17 at 00:51
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 528 52% 422 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% MSI(1462 116D) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 44.2 Reflection 46.5 Parallax 42.3 36% 44.4 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 43.9 Splatting 41.7 37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB 5,880 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUXA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5582 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1923 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 102 (C2) HDA temperature 54 27 313533792302 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	98.6% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 453 Mixed 480 107% 478 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 33 125% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 185 165% 249 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 163GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 122 122 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1972 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5580 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1920 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 280491 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 279173791787 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	62.7% Good	Read 115 Write 103 Mixed 98.1 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 75%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 141GB 57GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.3% Average	Read 78.8 Write 85.9 Mixed 75.1 60% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.22 75% 0.75 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 21.4 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16J4 Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J4

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	340x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	36x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	236x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	139x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 128GBThnsn5128gpu7Bench 139%, 3,510 samples	29x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	26x
PX-128M6G+ 128GBPlextorBench 80%, 311 samples	15x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	156x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	52x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback