ASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H87M-PLUS
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 380
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 50.4
32% 41.9 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 39.3
37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 278 252 69 246 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 352
Write 356
Mixed 329
SusWrite 182
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 35.9
126% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 134
109% 155 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
682GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 106 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 96.7
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 104
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PLUS/CSM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: ASUS H87M-PLUS/CSM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback