Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 18:47
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 243
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 864
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 2075) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 144
Parallax 147
126% 149 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 152 21 40 37 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 430
Write 286
Mixed 328
SusWrite 59.7
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 34.6
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 22
78% 170 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 91%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
85GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 318 319 321 320 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 488
Write 457
Mixed 446
SusWrite 340
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 105
80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 97%
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2609 2613 2034 1425 1473 1429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,771
Write 2,554
Mixed 1,749
SusWrite 1,931
505% 2,251 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 87.7
287% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 899
662% 875 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 357%
Great: 414%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
284GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 119
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 106
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
425GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 143 142 142 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 111
Write 76.2
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 140
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 35.1
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback