Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory	5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150714
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '21 at 12:42
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 72 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 146 58% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 239 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23% Poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 87.2 Parallax 0.2 0% 29.2 fps	MRender 91.9 Gravity 86.5 Splatting 72.8 67% 83.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 72 68 82 76 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 63 Write 78.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 75.8 43% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 253GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 93 91 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 114 Write 118 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 93.6 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Kingston ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	218x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	133x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	14x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	51x
ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 371 samples	20x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 4,503 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16