MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 10:20
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 593
58% 477 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 0460) 2GB
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 48.8
30% 42.2 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 27.6
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 480GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 256 152 2.6 2.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 417
Write 240
Mixed 268
SusWrite 70.5
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 9.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 103%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
414GB free
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 67 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 72.5
Write 80
Mixed 48
SusWrite 67.2
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
369GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 87 98 102 102 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97
Write 144
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 96.5
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 107%
47GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 56
Mixed 38
SusWrite 52.8
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 38%
WD 5000AAV External 500GB
248GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 22.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 12.9
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 22%
Freecom Hard Drive XS 1TB
541GB free, PID fc8e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 18.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 12.2
23% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E34 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback