Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.78% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-86 30 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Memory 46.5 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 35.2 24% 33.4 Pts	4-Core 43.6 8-Core 49.3 6% 46.4 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 30E4) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.1 1% 0.53 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 19 79 50 38 70 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.78% Terrible	Read 113 Write 10 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 49.6 10% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
TurionX2 Dual Core Mobile RM-72AMDBench 33%, 26 samples	2x
TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82AMDBench 35%, 30 samples	1x
Sempron SI-42AMDBench 27%, 500 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	6x