Acer NG-VN7-791G-79QW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NG-VN7-791G-79QW  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer NG-VN7-791G-79QW
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 198
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 432
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Acer(1025 091D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 16.2
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 15.1
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2AB990
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 43 47 44 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 8
Write 41.7
Mixed 11
SusWrite 43.8
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
547GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 112 115 112 111 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 96
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 108
57% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
156% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback