Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 21:56
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 248
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 750
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 49.3
34% 42.8 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 34.8
35% 44.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,991
Write 1,403
Mixed 1,461
359% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 51.3
228% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 383
DQ Mixed 173
202% 351 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 253%
Great: 283%
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65
194GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 502
Write 248
Mixed 305
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 23.1
145% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 78.7
105% 191 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
WD My Book 1105 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1017 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.2
Mixed 95.5
74% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
892GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 189
Mixed 185
141% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.73
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.43
206% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
397GB free
Firmware: D005DEM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 73.5
Write 68.8
Mixed 68.8
53% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.31
70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
251GB free
Firmware: 3.CHL Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 68.1
Mixed 68.1
52% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII EXTREME - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback