| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5B-VM SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090928 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 14 '21 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 70% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36.9%
Below average
|
31% 41 Pts
|
8% 63.7 Pts
|
4% 67 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
17% 26 fps
|
22% 26.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 13 32 26 22 36 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
14% 62.2 MB/s
|
20% 6.9 MB/s
|
15% 27.8 MB/s
|
|
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
550GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 67 67 66 64 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
40% 53.8 MB/s
|
143% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.9 10 10 10 9.8 MB/s
|
4.73%
Terrible
|
12% 9.9 MB/s
|
7% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
12% 4.3 GB/s
|
11% 3.93 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5B-VM SE Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5B-VM SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| Pentium Dual E2200Intel $54Bench 33%, 8,325 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples | 1x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $128 |