Panasonic CF-53SAV6JML

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPanasonic CF-53SAV6JML  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF53-3
Memory6 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 13:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 227
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JTPA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 171 193 233 197 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 243
Write 232
Mixed 234
SusWrite 196
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 21.8
68% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 136
114% 166 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-53SAV6JML Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-53SAV6JML

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback