Dell Latitude E4200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E4200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X271R
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 00:27
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9600
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 15.2
2-Core 24
27% 34 Pts
4-Core 24.9
8-Core 37.8
4% 31.3 Pts
64-Core 42.4
3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM800 TM 128 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 42 45 42 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 155
Write 30.4
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 36.1
16% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 8
40% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 8.1
5% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 1.8
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback