bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardSAPPHIRE PURE BLACK X58
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 22:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 488
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.33% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 194 201 190 187 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 506
Write 402
Mixed 316
SusWrite 192
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 28.4
94% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB
39GB free
Firmware: BXW7300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 383 383 387 388 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 632
Write 387
Mixed 382
SusWrite 382
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 29.3
104% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 186
139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback