Sony VPCZ110GL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCZ110GL  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 20:19
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 94.6
47% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 132
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 8.8 5.8 7.1 6.8 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 7.5
11% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.7
426% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 74%
Generic SU04G SD Card 4GB
3GB free
Firmware: 8.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.9
7% 10 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.2
298% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback