HP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-7300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 40.9
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 101
39% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 87
8-Core 103
12% 95.1 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
HP(103C 2215) 704MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 3.6
4% 4.5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 128 112 82 104 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
35GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 112 108 114 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61% Good
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 110
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.2 6.4 7.2 7.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.6
9% 8.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 8%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-56B4A0 320GB
16GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 30 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 26.3
Mixed 27
SusWrite 28.8
38% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-001.A01LF Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 MT Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback