Asus G750JS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JS
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 522
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 6.6
3% 11.3 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 469 444 454 476 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 449
Mixed 340
SusWrite 462
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 42.6
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 330
255% 349 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 205 213 242 265 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.2
Write 372
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 259
37% 159 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Mixed 4.7
16% 4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB KHX1600C9S3L/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback