ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '17 at 05:39
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 45.4 32% 44.4 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 39.6 5% 39 Pts	64-Core 38 2% 38 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G100 637 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1B0A 9004) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.87 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$140 4,505 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -103311143337658 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1529 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1529 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3962 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 37 57 68723212325 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1529 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5389 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 135477 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 51 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 135477 (F2) Unknown 100 100 145557 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4514	48.4% Average	Read 241 Write 207 Mixed 221 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 15.4 74% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 99.7 DQ Write 88 DQ Mixed 9.6 30% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 89%
TOSHIBA Q300 Pro 256GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 238GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 26 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.8 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.41 4K Write 6.98 4K Mixed 4.28 407% 5.89 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.2 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback