Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek Leonite2
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 05:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 45.4
32% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 38.5
8-Core 39.6
5% 39 Pts
64-Core 38
2% 38 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G100
Device(1B0A 9004) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.87
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$140
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 241
Write 207
Mixed 221
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 15.4
74% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 9.6
30% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 89%
TOSHIBA Q300 Pro 256GB
238GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 26
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.8
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.41
4K Write 6.98
4K Mixed 4.28
407% 5.89 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback