Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 20:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 688
66% 544 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 91.9
56% 74.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 47.1
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 493 631 626 367 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 919
Mixed 582
SusWrite 480
175% 785 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 41
156% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,164
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 216
264% 497 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 152%
Great: 254%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 111
Write 27.6
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 28.3
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 63%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 158 158 161 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 173
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 160
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93%
Great: 113%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
360GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 76.2
Write 76.7
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 72
98% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GVK 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 30.4
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback