Asus X550JK

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X550JK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550JK
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190416
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 11:11
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200H 11,882 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 163 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 178D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 5.7 3% 8.5 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 319 320 315 320 320 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 447 Mixed 433 SusWrite 334 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 57 191% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 359 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 128%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 225GB free Firmware: GN003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 70 68 70 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 39.3 Write 36.8 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 68 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73DM0-YK0 12GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 18.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

CPU
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	282x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	281x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	387x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	177x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	40x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,847 samples	38x
EDJ4208EFBG-GNL-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 268 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 29% - Poor

Total price: $36

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16