Asus PRIME H410M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H410M-D  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 10:05
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 763
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.84% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0
4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 71 8.9 58 63 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 302
Write 380
Mixed 294
SusWrite 67.7
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 22.1
98% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.5
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 50.2
71% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
879GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 178 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 171
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 180
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
47GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 39.3
26% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.95 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-030.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H410M-D Builds (Compare 724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback