Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 03:19
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.5 1-Core 139 2-Core 274 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 578 8-Core 1,099 100% 839 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1161) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.7% Good	Lighting 89.1 Reflection 83.4 Parallax 78.7 73% 83.7 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 69.5 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0824A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 72 8.1 93 30 7.3 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15% Very poor	Read 59.7 Write 239 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 35.4 21% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 0.6 26% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 0.1 19% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 31GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 339 406 455 458 337 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 452 Mixed 428 SusWrite 408 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 48.3 164% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 293 238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Silicon-Power SP008GXLZU320BSB 2x8GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.8% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 24.1 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 24.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	221x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	142x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	114x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16