Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 16:59
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 33.2
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 138
43% 81 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 239
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1701.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 84.1
53% 69.1 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 73.2
52% 62.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 464
Write 366
Mixed 390
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 15.1
89% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 14.3
40% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
460GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 148
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
20% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback