Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 20:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 651
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 39.3
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 0.2
18% 25.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston USNS4180S3128GJ 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 83 38 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 194
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 43.2
19% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 26.8
84% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 178
124% 153 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
101GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 140 123 138 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 192
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 133
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FH CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 29
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback