Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 360
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 53.2
48% 57.9 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 49.4
41% 50.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 241 184 119 96 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 281
Write 102
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 152
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 19.4
66% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 61.8
DQ Mixed 65.3
46% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 94%
INTENSO 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: S8FM05.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 92 192 248 266 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 354
Write 332
Mixed 230
SusWrite 190
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 19.8
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 68.7
80% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 100%
Corsair Voyager 8GB
3GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.6 6.9 7.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 7.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 7.4
14% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 029E CMV8GX3M1C1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $585
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback