HP p6716it-m

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP p6716it-m (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110318
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '21 at 09:41
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 70.1 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 152 58% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 198 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2A9C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 120GB 2,648 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 206 38 36 36 37 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 240 Write 217 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 83.4 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 8.4 46% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 0.6 51% 122 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 642GB free Firmware: HP40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 105 106 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 96 Write 97.9 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 105 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 65%
SanDisk SD8SBAT128G1122 128GB 119GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 4 18 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.23% Terrible	Read 3.7 Write 1.8 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 15 8% 5.82 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 42% 0.47 MB/s

TOSHIBA DT01ACA050 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 466GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 21 6.5 2.9 2.9 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 20.8 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 8 26% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1x4GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical p6716it-m Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP p6716it-m

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x
Radeon HD 3450ATIBench 1%, 4,621 samples	1x

SSD
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 2x2GBUnknownBench 28%, 257 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1x4GBUnknownBench 23%, 104 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 2x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 86 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16