Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 02:51
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 77
2-Core 152
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 470
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 10.9
5% 8.8 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 7.9
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 148 143 144 123 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 342
Write 396
Mixed 340
SusWrite 172
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 29.7
104% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 264
192% 250 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MK8032GSX 79GB
26GB free
Firmware: AS112D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
8.86% Terrible
Read 10.6
Write 21.3
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 19.9
12% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.86%
Great: 16%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB
0GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 8.8
Mixed 12.6
18% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2
105% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 121 125 120 101 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 138
Write 129
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 115
128% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback