Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 00:53
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 183
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 702
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 158
Parallax 145
117% 149 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 141
Splatting 107
98% 121 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 1TB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 666 634 552 535 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,018
Write 3,623
Mixed 1,984
SusWrite 604
465% 2,058 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 69.4
222% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,152
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 1,079
789% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 232%
Great: 466%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 188 188 188 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 124
Mixed 85
SusWrite 185
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
614GB free, PID ce21
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 30.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 36
40% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 34.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $978
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback