Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '17 at 04:16
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 124 54% 87.6 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 284 32% 250 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 0443) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.14% Terrible	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 7.94 8% 8.79 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 7.13 Splatting 7.3 6% 7.54 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.14% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74 29,295 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0121AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 289 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 402 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 41 (A3) Unknown 100 100 200 (94) Unknown 100 100 32230 (95) Unknown 100 100 492 (96) Unknown 100 100 333 (97) Unknown 100 100 467 (A4) Unknown 100 100 8543 (A5) Unknown 100 100 31 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35313776853015 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 31676 (F2) Unknown 100 100 51198 (F5) Unknown 100 100 50457 (F6) Unknown 100 100 64460 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	48.6% Average	Read 345 Write 175 Mixed 175 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 16.2 65% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 42.3 46% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 92%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 70GB free Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3770 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 537 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 943 (AD) Unknown 100 100 393229 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (C2) HDA temperature 70 63 158914117662 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1031 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 982 (F2) Unknown 100 100 493 (F4) Unknown 100 100 6 (F5) Unknown 100 100 13 (F6) Unknown 100 100 435968	61.6% Good	Read 368 Write 316 Mixed 299 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 13.6 74% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 22.9 47% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 111%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 100 Write 115 Mixed 96.2 135% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 130 Write 67 Mixed 29.1 80% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 1.17 101% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.3% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.8 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	567x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16