MSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 03:48
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 577
76% 572 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7977) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4678
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Lighting 8.03
Reflection 12
Parallax 7.84
6% 9.31 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 16.5
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 483
Write 270
Mixed 275
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 26.7
124% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 58
59% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
272GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 87.5
Mixed 72.1
65% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.37
91% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
164GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 129
Mixed 113
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.7
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A-G45 GAMING (MS-7977) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback