Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 101
44% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 15.1
9% 11.8 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 9
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 264 233 236 236 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 446
Mixed 310
SusWrite 244
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 44
150% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 249
182% 237 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX318C9SR/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 16
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback