HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 80B5
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '21 at 00:33
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 86.7
41% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80B5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 10.9
7% 9.73 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 8.1
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 109 110 107 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 108
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 15.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback