Lenovo 20L6S99200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20L6S99200  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20L6S99200
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181107
Uptime389.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 19:10
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 501
58% 449 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 225D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6223
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0
1% 2.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 337
Mixed 288
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 34.7
118% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 256
212% 305 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback