Acer Aspire A515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Doc_WC
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 18:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 123
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 367
33% 277 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1345) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.07 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 354 353 357 356 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 861
Write 510
Mixed 402
SusWrite 351
118% 531 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 19.5
91% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 401
323% 454 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1P24HC4N2-BYNS Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 17.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-54 Builds (Compare 1,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback