Lenovo 20F5S48X00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20F5S48X00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F5S48X00
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160315
Uptime18.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 157
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 228
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 504A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 156 112 115 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 427
Write 390
Mixed 299
SusWrite 121
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 37
116% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 296
237% 333 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F5S48X00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F5S48X00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback