Asus PRIME Z270-AR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-AR  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 12:09
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 313
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 611
83% 616 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 156
Parallax 173
129% 162 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
116% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 92 111 98 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 1,537
Mixed 877
SusWrite 212
229% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 75.5
254% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 263
329% 576 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 184%
Great: 255%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB
667GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 112 112 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 120
Write 96.8
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 110
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42
72GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 43.9
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 54.6
33% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
37GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 63
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 69.4
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 69%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
65GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 82.7
Write 39.9
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 39.4
60% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
144% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 24.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-AR Builds (Compare 1,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-AR - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback