Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 09:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 253
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 727
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6172
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 40
33% 40 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 40
Splatting 40
33% 40 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 973 1038 506 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,617
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 622
242% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 72.1
248% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 263
322% 557 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 211%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 13.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback