Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 02:31
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 825
85% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 370F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2695 MHz, MLim: 2600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 23.2
57% 23.2 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 97 54 53 54 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 491
Write 400
Mixed 362
SusWrite 89.5
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 39.6
144% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 236
194% 274 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 87%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
464GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 54 52 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 62.1
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 53.2
37% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3200C16 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback