Asus X550CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 79%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3537U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 84
2-Core 122
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 196
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 2.9
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD120G 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0407A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 123 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 300
Write 74.3
Mixed 110
SusWrite 125
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 6.2
43% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 41.6
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 32.4
40% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
268GB free
Firmware: GH2OA420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 113 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
64% Good
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 112
65% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback