Clevo P150EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemClevo P150EM  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P150EM
Memory18.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 16:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 448
51% 398 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.91
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 266
Write 155
Mixed 200
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 11
55% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 38.1
DQ Mixed 9.41
13% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 88%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
624GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 114
Write 97.4
Mixed 103
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.18
90% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F 0285 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P150EM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P150EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback