XMG P870TM_TM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemXMG P870TM_TM1  (all builds)
MotherboardXMG P870TM_TM1
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180903
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration372 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 858
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 133
Parallax 121
99% 125 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 124
Splatting 113
95% 116 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 1089 1054 820 1035 1031 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2185
Write 2,198
Mixed 1,495
SusWrite 1,069
389% 1,737 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 72
236% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 527
456% 701 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 261%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$249
406GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 1258 1263 1263 1263 1083 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 2186
Mixed 1,367
SusWrite 1,275
392% 1,749 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 67.7
220% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 464
455% 752 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 273%
Great: 371%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$249
131GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1510 1264 1266 1266 1265 1266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,172
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,385
SusWrite 1,306
398% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 68.5
222% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,367
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 471
454% 745 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 275%
Great: 371%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
114GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 242 163 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 463
Mixed 369
SusWrite 228
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 44
144% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 211
193% 298 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 473 473 473 472 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 465
Mixed 373
SusWrite 473
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 44.4
145% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 220
197% 300 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 24.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P870TM_TM1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

System: XMG P870TM_TM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $336
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback