Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 08:48
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 274
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 32.2
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 25.7
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 203 212 212 213 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.3% Good
Read 254
Write 245
Mixed 209
SusWrite 199
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 35.8
123% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 175
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
445GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 102 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 101
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST3320620NS 320GB-$40
247GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 49.5
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
70GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 99 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 70.9
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 99.8
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
45GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 55 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 92.2
Write 69.9
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 54.9
86% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback