HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime23 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 05:22
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 401
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.8% Good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 86.2
67% 87 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 94.9
75% 90.5 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 364 367 364 366 362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 371
Mixed 305
SusWrite 344
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 44.1
140% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 248
210% 307 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
162GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.4% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 39.8
Mixed 38
SusWrite 18.5
8% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 12.3
41% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 24.5
18% 24.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
267GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.3% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 39.6
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 18.4
8% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 12.3
41% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 25
DQ Mixed 26
19% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
378GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 155 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 149
Mixed 31
SusWrite 167
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback