Biostar GAMING Z170X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar GAMING Z170X  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 18:57
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.11% Terrible
Memory 8.98
1-Core 8.6
2-Core 16.8
7% 11.5 Pts
4-Core 29.1
8-Core 37.7
4% 33.4 Pts
64-Core 40
2% 40 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 7.11%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Biostar(1565 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 251 347 370 96 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 680
Write 315
Mixed 475
SusWrite 259
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 10.6
47% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 137
107% 148 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 174%
ASMT 2115 1TB
742GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 103 117 120 124 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 115
Write 101
Mixed 4.9
SusWrite 118
109% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4H4GL26A8TS6 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 413
10% 413 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GAMING Z170X Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar GAMING Z170X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback