Asrock B360 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 18:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 749
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 66.5
35% 51.4 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 63
Splatting 44.5
33% 38.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen11sm19ar128sdkm2 128GB 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0807A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 410
Mixed 371
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 1.1
77% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 1.1
47% 112 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
272GB free
Firmware: EC2ZB70R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 96.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 101
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 Pro4 Builds (Compare 671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback