Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 669
72% 572 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 71.2
56% 73.1 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 64.1
57% 70.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D512-11 SATA 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T89110A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 239 201 181 183 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 410
Mixed 360
SusWrite 234
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 50.2
168% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 284
214% 289 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
808GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 134 136 143 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 71.8
Write 111
Mixed 112
SusWrite 134
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
892GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 165 165 164 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 148
Write 117
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 163
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
775GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 141 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 128
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 140
157% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
743GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 105 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 85.1
Write 87.1
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 102
100% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 50%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
852GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 112 112 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 26
SusWrite 112
116% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback